![]() 10.3906/zoo-1810-4ĬEPELKA Ladislav,MICHALKO Radek,KULA Emanuel Efficiency of pitfall traps and snap traps in small terrestrial mammals depends on their diet composition. Efficiency of pitfall traps and snap traps in small terrestrial mammals depends on their diet composition. FoliaĬEPELKA L, MICHALKO R, KULA E (2019). Of small mammals during successive days of trapping. Zejda J, Pelikan J, Holisova V (1977).After Water Management Measures.Īmsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. Penka M, Vyskot M, Klimo E, Vasicek F (editors). A community of small terrestrial mammals. Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 841-845. Comparison of pitfall andĬonventional traps for sampling small mammal populations. Journal of Wildlife Management doi: 10.1002/ Abundance and edological associations of small Weldy MJ, Clinton CW, Lesmeister DB, Manning T, Linnell MA etĪl.Differential capture of deer mice with pitfalls and Viewegh J, Kusbach A, Mikeska M (2003).Two widely used commercial live-traps to develop monitoring Torre I, Freixas L, Arrizabalaga A, Diaz M (2016).Software for Multivariate Data Exploration, Testing, and York, NY, USA: Springer Science+Business Media LLC. Phylogenetic and Functional Ecology in R. Of two sampling methods of small mammals in the margin of a Stanko M, Mosansky L, Fricova J, Casanova JC (1999).Russian Journal of Ecosystem Ecology 2018: 3. Methods for estimating the abundance of small Trap types in sampling small mammals in forest fragments, Santos-Filho M, da Silva DJ, Sanaiotti TM (2006).A Language and Environmentįor Statistical Computing. (Bialowieza-National-Park) in relation to weather, seed crop,Īnd predation. Rodent population-dynamics in a primeval deciduous forest Pucek Z, Jedrzejewski W, Jedrzejewska B, Pucek M (1993).Trap response and estimation of numbers of shrews Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Pinheiro J, Bates D, Deb Roy S, Sarkar D (2017).Efficiency of different traps inĬatching small mammals. Pelikan J, Zejda J, Holisova V (1977).Zjisťovani populacni hustoty savcu v lesich. K ujednoceni odchytoveho kvadratu a linie pro Linearni modely s korelacemi v prostredi R. The cone trap - a useful tool for index trapping Relative efficiency of three types of small Modifications on trapping efficiency and mortality of small Effectiveness of live traps and snap traps in trapping Mammal populations with transects of snap traps and pitfallĪrrays in southwest Virginia. Preferences of common vole and mice species. Traditional andĭiversified crops in South Moravia (Czech Republic): habitat Janova E, Heroldova M, Konecny A, Bryja J (2011).(Rodentia, Microtidae) in the mountain zone of SorbetoPiceetum. Of no-tillage versus tillage system on common vole (MicrotusĪrvalis) population density. Heroldová M, Michalko R, Suchomel J, Zejda J (2018).Diets and habitat preferences of three species ofĬrocidurine shrews in arid southern Africa. Diets and coexistence in NeomysĪnd Sorex shrews in Bialowieza forest, eastern Poland. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6: 232-236. ![]() Tools, an R package for the measurement and estimation ofĪlpha and beta taxon, phylogenetic and functional diversity. Cardoso P, Rigal F, Carvalho JC (2015).Factors driving small rodentsĪssemblages from field boundaries in agricultural landscapes Butet A, Paillat G, Delettre Y (2006).Diet differentiation between EuropeanĪrvicoline and murine rodents. Biologica Gabonica 2: 163-177 (in French). Quantitative des populationes de vertebres dans la foret Recherches sur la composition qualitative et Trapability of trap-proneĪnd trap-shy bank voles. Andrzejewski R, Fejgin H, Liro A (1971).Acta Theriologica 3: 141-190 (in German). Gelb- halsmaus, Apodemus flavicollis flavicollis (Melchior ,ġ834).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |